Skip to content

Vested Rights Versus Nonconformity

April 12, 2011

Generally speaking, the doctrine of vested rights addresses a property owner’s right to complete a project under one set of requirements without fear that those requirements will be altered to his or her detriment at the eleventh hour.

Once the project is complete and a use is operational, changes to applicable zoning regulations can render the use or structure noncompliant.  The result is a nonconforming use or structure.  The right to continue to operate that nonconformity is typically governed by the express language of the applicable local ordinance.  The NCCOA’s recent decision in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. City of Salisbury, COA10-591, analyzes this nonconformity issue.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: